The Oracle in the Icebox: How a Fantasy Novel, a Math Proof, and a Talking Refrigerator Made You Think AI Was Smarter Than You

 


Let’s begin not in Silicon Valley, but in Oxford, in the early 1950s—where a young academic named J.R.R. Tolkien is scribbling away at a sprawling fantasy about elves, rings, and a Palantír—a magical crystal ball that shows you anything, anywhere, anytime.

But there’s a twist: the Palantír doesn’t tell you what’s true. It tells you what it wants you to see. And if you believe it too much, you become easy to control.

Now, flash to 1956, Dartmouth College. A group of mathematicians and dreamers—John McCarthy, Marvin Minsky, Claude Shannon—gather in a summer workshop and declare, with a straight face, that they can simulate human intelligence. They call it Artificial Intelligence. They expect it’ll take a few months. Maybe a year.

They were off by… let’s call it 70 years.

Meanwhile, in 1977, a quiet man named Stephen Cook publishes a dense proof about something called NP-completeness. It’s math speak for “some problems are just way, way harder than others.” No matter how smart your system is, it’s not going to solve certain things efficiently—like routing a school bus through every side street in Detroit and finding the cheapest pizza joint along the way.

In short: computers have limits. Even really, really clever ones.

But here’s where it all goes sideways.

Enter the talking fridge.

By the 2010s, tech companies are slapping AI onto everything—search engines, stock markets, toasters, toothbrushes. Suddenly, your fridge can tell when you’re out of oat milk. Great! But also… creepy. It knows what you eat. It suggests what you should eat. It reports your habits to the cloud. You’ve gone from “master of the kitchen” to “data source for a kitchen-based surveillance node.”

Now pile on ChatGPT, Midjourney, deepfakes, robo-lawyers, AI therapists, synthetic influencers, and a thousand TED Talks with titles like “This Algorithm Will Change Everything.”

People start saying weird things like:

“AI is our new overlord.”
“AI is God.”
“AI will fix democracy.”
“AI is democracy.”

But here’s the rub: AI isn’t magic. It’s math, plus data, plus incentives.

It’s only as smart as the people who built it. And those people? Mostly trying to sell you things. Or harvest your attention. Or replace your job with a more polite version of Clippy.

What we’ve built isn’t an oracle. It’s a Palantír.

It shows us what we already want to see, optimized for engagement, filtered through our past behavior, and piped through 5 billion personalized prediction engines. And if we believe it too much—if we trust it to drive our cars, teach our kids, choose our leaders—we risk becoming exactly what it was trained on: passive, predictable, pliable.

AI didn’t make itself smart.
We made ourselves small.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

The Norse Code: Vikings, Violence, and the Unexpected Birth of Empire

Image
  "The Norse Code: Vikings, Violence, and the Unexpected Birth of Empire" You know, when most people think of European colonialism, they jump straight to the Spanish in the Americas, or the British in India, all red uniforms and tea. But long before that — before muskets, flags, and treaties — there were bearded men in boats, with axes, and an alarming tendency to show up uninvited. I’m talking, of course, about the Vikings. Now the usual story goes: the Vikings were raiders. Plunderers. Pillagers. Yes, they were that — but also something more. Because while they were looting churches in England, they were also accidentally building the foundations of European expansion . Take the year 793 — the infamous raid on Lindisfarne. It wasn’t just the shock of violence. It was the realization that the sea was a highway , not a barrier. The Vikings weren’t trying to build an empire. They were looking for farmland, trade, and a good reason to leave Scandinavia — where, incidentally,...
Read more

Before Global Colonization: Europe’s Internal Empires

Image
  Throughout our shared history, humans have tirelessly sought to organize and structure society. At its most expansive, this quest for order and clarity has taken the form of empire. When we think of colonization, our minds often leap to distant shores—to the Americas, Asia, Africa. But long before these global journeys began, Europe itself was a continent colonized repeatedly from within. Here, within Europe's borders, we find a powerful story about human governance, expansion, exploitation, and the complicated legacy that empire leaves behind. The Roman Empire set the mold. From the first century BCE to its collapse in the fifth century CE, Rome reigned over vast territories stretching from Britain to North Africa. Romans were exceptional builders, organizers, and administrators. Their roads, bridges, aqueducts, and cities linked distant lands and diverse peoples into a single entity. Yet beneath Rome’s impressive engineering and cultural legacy lay the harsh reality of slavery....
Read more

Deep Research on Longevity, Elite Agendas, and the Population Decline Discourse

  Longevity, Elite Agendas, and the Population Decline Discourse Elite Voices Linking Population and Longevity Prominent tech billionaires and investors have increasingly weighed in on global birthrates – some drawing connections (implicitly or explicitly) to life-extension ambitions. Elon Musk has repeatedly sounded the alarm about falling fertility, calling population decline “the biggest danger civilization faces by far” newyorker.com . Musk has famously acted on his pronatalist stance (fathering around a dozen children), even allegedly offering to donate his own sperm to help others have kids (a claim he denied) newyorker.com . Intriguingly, Musk’s concern for more babies comes despite his skepticism of radical longevity; he argues that societal progress requires generational turnover and has said “it is important for us to die” lest society ossify under immortal leaders futurism.com persuasion.community . In other words, Musk fears a “gerontocracy” if people don’t age out,...
Read more